Creating a new political party. Need some feedback on the budget.

C

CaptainTrouble

Based Member
Since voting for other people won't solve anything, I figure I'm going to create my own political party then market it. Given the tools available today, it's easy enough.

My goal isn't to become Prime Minister with every Premier supporting me but that would be nice; although, is prefer being Supreme authoritarian leaders rather than Prime Minister. My goal is just creating the framework for a better society and back it up in a manner that can't be refuted. "Trust the science". Then promote the ideas in a manner that at the very least will upset people I consider to be my enemy.

Things change fast and you never know how people will feel and shift into the future.

I've uploaded the summary of the plan and the full plan if anyone wants to take a look then give me some feedback with any concerns they might have with the plan. Here's the highlights:

  • No new taxes
  • Existing taxes are slowly reduced down to 0% and replaced with a 15% consumption tax (that applies to all goods and services including rent and interest profit on debt payments), the tax is paid by importers also and a capital outflow levy of 15% is applied to profits being withdrawn from the country
  • All social programs are eventually eliminated over 16 years but old age security is grandfathered in for people 55yo+ and CPP is paid out to those who've already paid based on what they've paid-in.
  • Healthcare and education are fully privatized with $0 of public funds going to either.
  • A basic income top-up for the poorest Canadians of $2400 is added that eventually reduces to $0 over 20 years.
  • A healthcare subsidy is provided to people who would go into poverty to pay for healthcare that would shrink overtime to near 0 as poverty rates are reduced.
  • Disability is kept for those already on it (removed for new entrants) but with a new work-capicty test to earn payments at full, half or none.
  • Immigration is limited to 0.2% of total population per year. Non-citizens cost employers a 20% levy on their wages as a tax to employ.
  • Removes the legal requirement to consult natives for new projects.
  • Birth rates go up from 1.3 to 1.9. This along with the reduction in immigration essentially keeps the population steady or slightly lower.

Overall, GNI Per Capita PPP Adjusted will increase to $388,700 in 100 years under my plan and if we keep to Carney's government it'll be $162,700. Poverty will decrease under my plan more than Canada's baseline plan.

Let me know if there are any downsides.

This is also the central case on a 3 tier scenario analysis but given how conservative Claude is, I believe the optimistic case is more probable.
 

Attachments

  • The 100-Year Plan What It Means for Canadians (1).pdf
    382.2 KB · Views: 0
  • The 100-Year Plan (1).pdf
    777 KB · Views: 0
Upvote 12
Canadian politics and the people here are supremely fucked. Every party in agreement about how to move the country forward with only some minor variance on small points, yet we have such passionate and lively debates.

A serious budget won't get you anywhere. Going full Vermin Supreme is probably the best approach. When elected I will be deporting every MP to Botswana.

You need to be a protest vote but in such a way where its almost impossible to label you any flavor of right wing.

This is why I think every province needs its own Bloc party. It creates a situation where the country will be governed in an agreeable fashion or it grinds to a halt possibly for good.
 
I will be forming the Gender Equity Mutilator (GEM) party for the next election; I think it's high time we get the female genital mutilation numbers on parity with male genital mutilation numbers. We must right this historical wrong!
View attachment gem alert bell.MP4
 
↑View previous replies…
The budget is just the beginning. I have multiple angles of attack.

I actually plan on creating a purely Indian political party that utilizes this budget but frames it all in a manner that sounds like the budget is being done to promote Indian Nationalism instead of White Nationalism. I may even add funding toward a sovereign khalistan within Canada with treaties like the Native Indians while promoting a Hindu and Sikh unification project.

That's just one angle. I'll be coming at things from every possible angle.
 
In my honest opinion, unless you’re gonna be a dictator with non woke and dei military support for a few years and just force shit through and be the bad guy with a huge protection entourage so you don’t happen to stab yourself in the back by accident, nothing will change or happen.

We are now half low IQ slave races who can only be controlled, removed and kept out via dictatorship until the percentages reverse. The entirety of society would need a revamp because access to the internet and gadgets has not made anyone smarter, quite the opposite in the majority of cases. The amount of people who would have to be made an example of one way or another would be massive. People wanna keep being all nice and shit and use logic and reason and see where that has gotten us in the last decade or two? Yeah, exactly.
 
There's 0 chance any of my plan gets implemented without a dictatorship. For one thing, it doesn't work for about 20-40 years. It requires generational changes. There would be significant resistance over time but then eugenics would kick in and that resistance would fade but again, it would take generations. It's only possible to implement with a dictatorship. That still doesn't mean a person can't promote the plan in political discussions despite it never being able to be implemented. Nothing that will be implemented in Canada will ever be good for Canada so it doesn't matter if one promotes something that won't be implemented since, it's all the same in the end anyhow. Better to go all out supporting radical change then go to the PP route.
 
Well imo you have about one more generation, two if you’re lucky before we will fall into the same hole that Mao dug for China. After that no one will remember anything else and those that do will be patted on the head “there there gramma and grampa, go have a nap now.” The nap could very well be MAID eh.
 
My question to you is, what makes you so sure of yourself that you think that you could lead any kind of movement? What makes you think you could lead any kind of resurgence or rebellion? How are you any different than any other dictator? Is your goal democratic change or violent revolution? Is violence your go-to or a last resort? Exactly how do you get your message across and is deception part of your platform? Are you a fed? Not that I expect an honest answer but, it needs to be asked. In my experience, as a lurker on different platforms, the ones promoting violent revolution are usually fed plants. And, I've witnessed you advocating for violence on this platform. Asking for a friend.
 
My question to you is, what makes you so sure of yourself that you think that you could lead any kind of movement?
Click to expand...
I'm not sure but it's me, me, me or no one else.

What makes you think you could lead any kind of resurgence or rebellion?
Click to expand...
See above.
How are you any different than any other dictator?
Click to expand...
I'm likely not but the idea that all dictators are bad and democracies aren't is propaganda. I know I'm better than most people so I'd take myself over anyone democratically elected.

Is your goal democratic change or violent revolution?
Click to expand...
Whatever works to get needed change.

Is violence your go-to or a last resort?
Click to expand...
Neither. Whatever is needed to get the needed change. No preference whatsoever. Whatever produces the better outcome taking into account the cost to achieve it. Keep in mind, many of the greatest progresses our society has had came from violence and so too the greatest setbacks. Not all violence is bad. Sometimes violence is the only way. Sometimes there are alternatives to violence that are better. I'm getting old now though. Violence I myself partake in is probably not the way forward for me but if any movement I started ended up with Mark Carney's head on a platter and some of his loyal politicians speared through the ass and planted upright on parliament square, I wouldn't be directly opposed to it. Of course, this isn't my goal though. I can't control what others do. I don't explicitly oppose violence unless that violence is used against me and my aims, then I'm 100% against such violence and all people who'd promote violence in opposition to myself and my aims should be imprisoned for radical violent views, of course. Essentially, I'm the same as every other ruler/leader when it comes to violence. Violence they do is justified and good. Violence others who oppose them do is unjustified and bad.

Exactly how do you get your message across and is deception part of your platform?
Click to expand...
Funny you mention that. The more I've discussed this with leftists, the more I think deception should be part of the plan but also the more I think deception won't really work. It was leftists who even brought up deception with me saying it sounds like I'm trying to trick them into accepting a Nazi plan. Leftists understand what things are counter to their ideology whether deception is in play or not. I'm not 100% convinced on this yet. I'm thinking no deception but also not being fully transparent of the long-term goal.

Once I've set the foundation, I will use social media marketing to get the message across. I know someone who is very good at this who will help me.

Are you a fed?
Click to expand...
No. But I'm not convinced feds haven't tagged me either. I actually think I've run into feds a few times irl who seemed to be "investigating" me. Could be paranoia but there's been a few people in my life that aren't anymore whose purpose seemed questionable. I've had relationships with ex-cons, gang members, RCMP, CSIS, military people and I've been in groups designated as terrorist organizations before... so anything is possible. Me specifically? Absolutely not. However, if I'm being honest with you, I'd flip if given $10M. At least at this stage. If I get closer to my goals, the price goes up and it'd eventually reach a point where it becomes nonnegotiable.
 
Last edited:
Across the forums, I agree with much of what you say, but you have revealed yourself to be a ruthless and non-spiritual type(IMO), and too dependent on AI for your plots. A true political savant/savior would not need to rely so heavily on those tools.
 
I don't rely on AI at all. I already knew all of this and have promoted all of this without AI. The AI exists for convincing the leftists and lower IQ plebs. AI is a useful tool for authority. Leftists don't listen to me but they shutup when their ChatGPT repeats what I say.

I'm also quite spiritual but I don't believe in passive spiritualism where actions in reality don't matter because all that matters is a spirit realm unknown to us. This is feminine spirituality and what Christianity was based on hence why it's a feminine religion. I believe everything we do here impacts the spirit as readily as the spirit impacts everything here so I believe in active spiritualism which implies taking action. This is masculine spirituality and what our ancestors believed before our society become feminized.

I don't value life though in the sense that life is more important than death. Both states of being are important. You cannot have life without death. Killing of others can be a useful tool for empowering the life of those who remain and I have 0 qualms about this. To allow a flower to bloom, you sometimes need to cut off the rotting stems.
 
You have said in other threads that Christianity has failed our civilization so should be discarded. Perhaps in it's application/interpretation in our society that is true, but when the Bible talks about loving/welcoming foreigners, I have a hard time believing that referred to allowing a civilization to be steamrolled for the benefit of immigrants.

To be transparent, I am a fairly new/vague Christian. I cannot speak about the Bible through any scholarly lens, having only read it once.
 
@JuliusEbola You can be spiritual without being Christian. In fact, I'd argue Christianity detaches people from spirit rather than enhances it.

I used to think more like you in the past and I used to promote Correct Christianity. For example: you said "I have a hard time believing that referred to allowing a civilization to be steamrolled for the benefit of immigrants." It wasn't. Neighbor in the bible means your own kind not foreign neighbor and the bible was written in a period of time where locomotion was difficult, costly and not done by many so showing kindness to foreigners meant showing kindness to a one-off unique person coming within your realm. It was never meant as an invitation to foreign invaders to come and destroy your society as it is used today.

The problem is that you can say this 1000 times and someone will quote the bible literally to prove you wrong. All your energy now becomes wasted in trying to argue the truth of the bible.

God didn't have some jews write the bible so that it was a requirement for men to follow God. Every single person born today has a bible written inside of him called his DNA (genetics). What is right and what is wrong is already programmed into you regardless of what a book says. The true path of the Godly and spiritual man isn't arguing like Pharisees over the meaning of words on a piece of paper. It's about feeling what is the correct path through yourself because God works through you regardless of what books you read. Jesus didn't need to read the bible to do what he did. Every single White man already has the entire blueprint of what he needs to do to follow God, to be a good person and to be spiritual without ever reading a word in the bible.

This is what I mean when I say a "new religion". Christianity in modernity has become precisely what Jesus was trying to break people away from in the first place. It has become a bunch of phrases and rules people invoke upon others to prevent others from actually taking action to do good in society for fear of what they end up doing is actually a sin. Jesus's purpose was to stop this madness from destroying society by dying for people's sins so they could live not in fear of sin but so they could act out being a good person. Christianity has become the very thing Jesus fought against.

This is what I mean when I say we need to scrap Christianity and start a new religion. The name of the religion is irrelevant in God's eyes. The name Jesus is irrelevant in Jesus's eyes. All that matters is living according to God's will and that blueprint is in every human's genetics already; it is not words written on a piece of paper. For White people to prosper we must move away from the restrictions placed upon our being by these Pharisees that claim to know what is good and evil better than us and listen to our hearts (our genetics). The more White people become one with themselves the more they become one with God.

This is what I mean when I say it's time to scrap Christianity and start anew. Modern Christianity is holding us back from our relationship with the divine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top