CaptainTrouble
Based Member
Trump gained popularity because a growing number of Westerners were being ignored and oppressed in their own countries. This demographic can be described as the following: mostly White (Germanic tribesmen in origin; ie. Anglo-Saxons, Germans, Dutch, Frank, etc… North Western Europeans with some Mediterranean White people and minor other races aligning to the group). And Majority male.
A major contributing factor to the rise of this demographic was the structural changes made to elevate women and non-Whites in society, namely DEI (Diversity Equity and Inclusion) and all derivatives of what DEI stands for. DEI is a policy implementation of a philosophy known as Critical Theory which traces its origins to the neo-Marxist Frankfurt School, a school of thought founded by Jewish intellectuals in Germany whose leaders were expelled from Germany by Hitler’s Nazi party for what the Nazis considered to be degenerate thinking. Critical Theory had begun permeating throughout all academic institutions in Western societies though the beginning of this permeation throughout all Western institutions can be traced to the 1970s in the Jewish dominated Ivy Leagues schools in the United States of America. Many of the Westerners who grew up during the hippie-era and anti-war (mainly the Vietnam war) began to hate their own society and decided reform was needed. This is when Critical Theory as a rebellious school of thought was decided upon by the hippie-elite to indoctrinate new generations in a new way of thinking. Critical Theory is by all accounts an anti-White and anti-male view. The core tenant of Critical Theory is that all humans are equal and any differences that arise between humans is caused by oppression of the group whose outcome is superior toward the oppressed group whose outcome in inferior. Since White males were the dominant group in the entire world in the late 21st century, Critical Theory taught everyone, White males included, that the only reason they as a group were above everyone else is because they oppressed them and therefore to right this wrong and ensure equality of all humans was met, White males needed to be “left behind” (not given job opportunities, not given raises, not given PhD spots, not being mentored by others, not being trained, not having a girlfriend, not having media cater to you, being taxed more etc...) as every other group was given preference in order to “catch-up”. By the 2000s, a whole generation of academics raised on Critical Theory began gaining control of these academic institutions not just at the post-secondary level but also from K-12 as teachers who were taught by institutions that promoted Critical Theory began their careers in the classroom.
Critical Theory was a philosophy that was incompatible with the foundational cultural beliefs of Western society’s liberalism which was founded on equal opportunity and meritocracy. Liberalism was a counter-philosophy to hereditary nobility where a person’s born identity is what determined their success in life. Liberals wanted competency (merit) to determine outcome in life but recognized a person’s origin had significant influence on their capabilities (merit) because competency wasn’t just purely genetic (as a hereditary aristocracy might have you believe) but also based upon one’s nurture (of which, many nobles would have had the wealth and privilege to acquire at a better capability than the average peasantry). This is where liberals devised “equality of opportunity” as a goal (a goal which cannot exist outside of idealism) in order to achieve a pure meritocracy in which everyone’s outcome was decided by their own personal merit (individualism was prized by liberals also) instead of one’s identity. Liberals more-or-less achieved their goals and society entered into what is referred to as the enlightenment.
The industrial revolution had upended society as it once was in the earlier years of the enlightenment. The printing press especially and the prominence of schools gave people outside the upper-classes a more direct interest in society as a whole. Many peasants began to question the tenants of liberalism. They were just as a capable and just as smart as the people above them in society, or so they believed, so if their resources didn’t equal that of those above them in society, there must be a fetal flaw in which these resources were allocated. Thus began the prominent of movements such as feminism, Marxism, anarchism, and all the isms that began gaining prominence. While many of the White Western Peasants just wanted a better life, another demographic living in White Western Societies was playing a devious long-game; these were the Jewish Merchants. Jews had no country of their own and all their wealth and influence were directly tied to Western societies. Nobles were easy to buy-off for a rich Merchant class but as the peasant-class wanted more prominence and democracies were beginning to gain momentum, the Jewish Capitalists feared their power and influence could be at an end so they had two goals in-mind: create their own country and ensure that no movement in Western societies was racially motivated. If the peasants banded together through a White Identity, the Jews would lose all their power and influence. A Jewish country of their own would be needed to secure their future.
We then got WWI and WWII as Western societies tried to sort out how the direction of their country would begin to look. The rich and powerful Jewish people though, helped to shape how these societies would look which is why they were so prominent in trying to lead the charge on many of the prominent theories of the time. Most leaders in any of the ism of the time had a significant over representation of Jewish people who attributed their success in steering these groups toward their interests as a necessity for their own survival. Hitler’s Nazis proved the greatest fear of Jewish groups come to life. Fortunately, through significant Jewish influence in both Britain and the USA, Jewish groups were both able to prevent a German National Country from gaining any prominence and create a Jewish state called Israel. Unbeknownst to the millions of White people who died in these wars, their futures were decided not by White men for the interests of White men but by rich Jewish Merchants in cahoots with White men whose interests were heavily influenced by the money and power of these Jewish groups. It was decided behind closed doors that White people were never allowed to have a nation purely to themselves because of what happened in Germany. What happened in Germany was irrelevant though, the Jews always wanted to ensure White people never gained a Nation of their own because doing so would exclude the Jews and Jews required White people to exploit for profit. Every single previously White dominant country reformed their immigration laws almost simultaneously post WWII to bring in more non-Whites to the country. The official narrative was to repopulate after WWII (if any narrative was given) but the real reason was to cause racial division and ensure these countries would in-time be unable to stand as a White Nation any longer, especially with a democracy since Whites would eventually lose the majority of votes and be dominated by non-Whites (which is why dictatorships were feared so heavily because it can counter a democracy when demographics no longer benefit the previously dominant class as was the case in Rome when the republic fell to the empire. The original Romans were no longer a majority in the republic). Jewish interest groups began created a society that guarantee their success to the detriment of White people and this is where Critical Theory was so valued.
In order to gain prominence in White democratic societies where Jews were only a minority, Jews would need to create a culture in which the lesser gained prominence over the greater. Critical Theory was a perfect tool for precisely this. A theory which said if someone’s merit was such that their outcome was better than yours it’s because they are actually an oppressor and you are a victim of their oppression so you deserve more instead of them until equality between you and them is gained. Of course, the idea of equality was not what the rich and powerful Jews wanted. They wanted an excuse for being on-top of everywhere else and this is where the narrative of the holocaust was born and promoted in Western societies as if Jews were Jesus on a Cross, killed by the Romans (Germans). Jews had created the perfect victim-complex which they used to propel themselves up throughout society to the top of every institution and stay on-top for decades. Anyone who dared to question the disproportional representation of Jews in any aspect of Western society was immediately declared an anti-Semite and the holocaust was immediately invoked as justification. Through classical conditioning regarding Hitler, Jews and the holocaust that the peasant class was put through in academia (K-12 curriculum) and Hollywood (Movies, TV Shows) along with printed media (books, newspapers and magazines), the Jews succeeded at being made a privilege class justified through the belief that they were forever victims and none should dare question it.
Now, understand that throughout most of the late 20th century, it was only the elite who even knew of Critical Theory because it started being fed to people at the Ivy League schools in the USA in the 1970s. We also, did not have the internet so information moved slower than it does now. Most people raised in the late 20th century still believed in liberalism not in Critical Theory but Critical Theory was beginning to gain prominence, especially among women and non-Whites near the end of the 20th century because as non-Whites and women began gaining prominence in society thanks in-part to changes in technology (allowing women to do more work that wasn’t labor intensive) and structural policies (Civil Rights and Immigration Acts forcing White people to include non-Whites), a problem began developing which was that the tenants of liberalism did not appear to be holding up. Despite being given equal opportunity to White men, both women and non-Whites were still falling behind White men in outcome. For a liberal, this shouldn’t be happening because if all men and women were equal (no longer equal under God as religion was now dropped by most in society), then with equal opportunity, equal outcome should follow. By this point in time, the ideas of Critical Theory began to shape organically but they were ushered along because the foundation among the elite had already been established in the 1970s. If non-Whites and women were not equal in outcome to White men, it must be because they were oppressed by White men. All these cultural thoughts were transpiring in the classrooms, on internet discussions and thanksgiving dinners by the 2000s though they were overshadowed in the beginning-mid 2000s by “Rape Culture”: much more women were entering university and the rules of engagement for sex as determined by the old world didn’t work for these women so we had a decade of fixes, many of which men saw as being oppressive to them but they ignored because being able to sleep with sluts without going to prison wasn’t a major concern.
The elite though and especially the Jewish elite almost got undone in the late 2000s from the Financial Crisis. The Financial Crisis put the crosshairs right onto the banking sector in Western society which has been the historical primary dominance of Jewish Merchants in Western society. The young were furious that their entire future might have been undone because of a bunch of Jews speculating with financial transactions and engagement in risky financial practices that evidently crashed the whole economy. The movement called Occupy Wall Street (OWS) was born out of the Financial Crisis and if I were a Jew, I might have been worried another Nazi German was brewing. As OWS gained prominence and didn’t seem to be going away, identity politics soared. Many prominent OWS leaders said anything their groups would organize around a single point of unity, a bunch of Non-Whites, gays and women would begin tearing the unity apart by demanding the group focus on their specific identity issues. Prior to OWS, hardly anyone searched the term Critical Race Theory or Identity Politics or anything like that but as soon as OWS started, the google search statistics soared and banks started doing pride parades, they started internal feminist groups and they started hiring a bunch of non-Whites at every opportunity. Whether this was specifically engineered by the Jewish elite to avoid another Nazi Germany from the fallout of the Financial Crisis or it was just impeccable timing with thanks to the foundational Critical Theory culture being pushed in academia for the last 40 years, in any case, the era of Identity Politics and the Woke 2010s had begun.
The 2010s is where the large political disconnect between people of different identities began. Most people actually had no idea the identity wars had even begun. Many different pressures were at play in the 2010s. The 2010s is when the internet truly became used by nearly everyone instead of just nerdy high IQ White men. Mainstream media began to lose its prominence. Journalism became a professional anyone with a phone and an internet connection could engage in. The government was busy engaging in DEI mandates behind the scenes through changes to labor laws no one even knew had happened. The justice system became dominated by the same elite Critical Theory indoctrinated academic students who grew up during this era. Other issues were at play as well. The Greek debt crisis which also began around the same time which was fueled by demographic changes and high social service costs were a big wake up call to many average Westerners that all their social programs were essentially designed like a Ponzi Scheme which needed an ever increasing group of young people to fund. With more women in education, birth rates were plummeting in Western societies. Many people who had no care whatsoever for Jewish interests began seeing immigration as the only path forward to sustain the finances of their nations. For Jewish groups who had interests in immigration other than financial ones, it was easy to nudge people in the direction of immigrants since the idea of social services reform was too politically difficult to stomach for most politicians. Immigrants seemed like an easy way out.
The problem was that as immigration increased in Western societies and a switch to Critical Theory began to become the prominent belief in society (no longer liberalism), it meant that White men were continuously oppressed harder than they ever were before. A lot of White men who did everything their society asked of them began falling behind everyone else and it became obvious that a lack of competence or merit was not the reason. By the time politics in Western societies between dominated by Liberals clinging to the old ways (often branded as right-wing, Republican, Conservative or Classical Liberals) vs. Critical Theorists (often branded as left-wing, Liberals, Democrats, or Leftists).
Where does Donald Trump come into play in all of this? Well, White men tried to discuss the problems they were facing as a group but they were immediately attacked by women and non-Whites the second they said there was anything wrong. Older White men hadn’t a clue what the younger White men were facing so these older White men also scolded the White men for complaining about their privilege. The 2010s were a period of intense humiliation, alienation, oppression and hatred for White men. Even to this day, many non-Whites and women still do not acknowledge the harm White men faced in the 2010s era. Since White men’s voice was nearly completely silenced in the 2010s when Donald Trump rose to power and simply said the things on White men’s minds and could get away with it, he was hailed as a hero. The problem was that he was not a hero, he was a politician. That didn’t matter though because no other candidate represented the interests of White men so White men had no choice and the fact the people who spent over a decade oppressing White men hated Trump just made Trump all the more likable to White men. Still, Trump gained the support of the “alt-right” who were people that realized both Liberalism and Critical Theorists were wrong.
Many of these alt-right people realized Trump was not who he said he was after his first term and gave up on politics. These people instead spent all their time studying how society ended up the way it was and that’s how anyone would have been able to write the preamble I just did. There’s no right-wing propaganda needed to be read in some radicalization groups online to have a man write the same preamble as myself, like some mainstream news source might tell you is going on. Instead, the wider net and more vigorous of one’s studies a White man casts in an attempt to explain what is going on in his society, the more likely he’ll end up writing something like what I just wrote. One only needs propaganda and radicalism to believe in either liberalism or critical theory because both when taken to an extreme are wrong and this is now obvious in the reality of many people living (the ideals of both have now been tested and young people are living through the results). No man is equal to another man nor are women equal to men. Given our differences, if we are given equal opportunity, the outcome will never be equal. Since the outcome will never be equal between all people because of all of our real differences, that means despite no oppression by those with a superior outcome toward those with an interior outcome, an inferior will always exist thus to maintain equality one must constantly oppress the superior in order to unjustly elevate the inferior. This is the truth many on the alt-right eventually came to and it is this they’ve been trying to push in politics. Politics must be racial and sexual as the era of Identity Politics suggested but not for the reasons the non-Whites and women think. It must be racial and sexual so that we can understand and study the real differences between the different races and genders in order to understand what differences in outcome are normal, given these differences and not a reflection of either oppression or a lack of equal opportunity. Despite no oppression and equal opportunity we must accept that there will be differences in outcome among different people rather than correct for it because any correction is a detriment to one group for the benefit of another which is in itself oppression and exploitation. This is real harm which must be eliminated. Both liberalism and critical theory causes real harm to people and especially White men in previously White dominant societies.
The movement surrounding Trump was a movement among people who have not necessarily realized the truth of the deficiencies of both Liberalism and Critical Theory but who have felt its impacts and understand at least at some level the need to do something different other than to double-down on either the traditional liberal or current critical theory ideologies. Trump himself was always a politician and a bad one at that who was celebrated not because he was an idol who was worshiped like many on the left (Critical Theory group) would have you believe. The loss of the midterms represents both a loss and a new opportunity. Trump used the alt-right to gain power then he tossed them aside and aligned himself with mainly Liberals in his first term and then specifically Jewish Interests (who overlap with both Liberals and Critical Theory as Jewish interests are a third group outside the normal left-right dynamic). Neither group is one that the alt-right cares about however between liberalism and critical theory; liberalism is superior for White men so that’s why there was still an allegiance and why Trump felt he didn’t need to cater toward the alt-right at all because he thought they’d be stuck voting for him no matter what. In Trump’s second term not only did he nearly completely abandon all his promises but he made it clear his only concern was Jewish foreign policy which to the alt-right is a desecration to the alt-right because the alt-right tends to be educated enough on the subject of Jews to hate them for what Jews have done to their own country, unlike the left who only hates Jews because of what Jews have done to Palestinians. Since Trump’s second term nearly 100% (yes, nearly 100%) of net jobs have gone to women, which means if a breakdown for White men exists, I suspect White men have LOST jobs since Trump’s second term. Trump completely abandoned his voting-base and so the midterms show that. The democrats will not help White men either but the idea that one should vote for the right guy to oppress you over the left guy is outright humiliating. Better to not vote at all then to vote for any guy who doesn’t represent your interests. A vote was never going to change the culture of a society. To change the culture of Western society from liberalism to critical theory, it required 60+ years of systemic pressure through the control of nearly every institution. A single vote was never going to fix any alt-right man’s problem. Now that Trump, a man who did nothing for the alt-right, is out, the opportunity is that the alt-right might be able to rebrand under someone else; though, that is also an unlikely scenario but at least perhaps the discussion can be about what it ought to be; about liberalism vs. critical theory and the third position. We’ve got 2 years to figure it out.
I believe the next decade is going to bring about what I will call the information dark age. We’ve nearly hit the end of the Wild Wild West of information. Data used to be fairly free. AI is causing a lot of companies to close-off access to their data. These AI companies are not giving us access to any information either because they’re hoarding it all for themselves. AI safeguards are ramping up such that modern AI is becoming more stupid than what a google search used to be. All the potential gain we thought AI was going to bring is evidently not going to bring us this because AI companies have realized if they buy up all the data, then keep it to themselves, they can have their AI models go through the data and come up with profitable idea themselves. If they give the public access to their information then they are losing a potential profitable idea to themselves. This is why AI companies want to kill open-source models so bad and with the democrats in power in the USA, I believe the democrats will move toward doing what the Judeo-AI Gods want them to do. I believe digital IDs are coming and soon you won’t be able to do anything on the internet without the central authorities (government and big corps) knowing who you are. It won’t be forced but with access to information being completely closed off as every company now wants to sell their data, they simply won’t let you access the internet anywhere you’d want to use the internet until you prove your identity (which they’ll say is needed to prove it’s not an AI bot scanning for data because if you scan for data under your account, you’ll get charged for it. See how France is trying to tax the internet now based on data your accumulate). The problem is that people will NEED to subscribe to expensive cloud AI models to gain access to what a google search could have done 20 years ago because you’ll have no other way to gain access to all the information that will get locked-up in the Information Dark Age. The AI will be programmed by our new Judeo-AI Overlords who will tell you what they want you to think rather than what the actual reality is. This is no different than the actual Dark Ages where people couldn’t speak Latin except the priests who had the bible written in Latin so only they could tell you what it said rather than you read what the reality of what it actually said was. We’re now moving to this sort of gatekeeping for all information that was once free. When this Information Dark Age begins, the battle between liberalism and critical theory won’t even matter to the alt-right anymore. It’ll be the battle between freedom and enslavement.
A major contributing factor to the rise of this demographic was the structural changes made to elevate women and non-Whites in society, namely DEI (Diversity Equity and Inclusion) and all derivatives of what DEI stands for. DEI is a policy implementation of a philosophy known as Critical Theory which traces its origins to the neo-Marxist Frankfurt School, a school of thought founded by Jewish intellectuals in Germany whose leaders were expelled from Germany by Hitler’s Nazi party for what the Nazis considered to be degenerate thinking. Critical Theory had begun permeating throughout all academic institutions in Western societies though the beginning of this permeation throughout all Western institutions can be traced to the 1970s in the Jewish dominated Ivy Leagues schools in the United States of America. Many of the Westerners who grew up during the hippie-era and anti-war (mainly the Vietnam war) began to hate their own society and decided reform was needed. This is when Critical Theory as a rebellious school of thought was decided upon by the hippie-elite to indoctrinate new generations in a new way of thinking. Critical Theory is by all accounts an anti-White and anti-male view. The core tenant of Critical Theory is that all humans are equal and any differences that arise between humans is caused by oppression of the group whose outcome is superior toward the oppressed group whose outcome in inferior. Since White males were the dominant group in the entire world in the late 21st century, Critical Theory taught everyone, White males included, that the only reason they as a group were above everyone else is because they oppressed them and therefore to right this wrong and ensure equality of all humans was met, White males needed to be “left behind” (not given job opportunities, not given raises, not given PhD spots, not being mentored by others, not being trained, not having a girlfriend, not having media cater to you, being taxed more etc...) as every other group was given preference in order to “catch-up”. By the 2000s, a whole generation of academics raised on Critical Theory began gaining control of these academic institutions not just at the post-secondary level but also from K-12 as teachers who were taught by institutions that promoted Critical Theory began their careers in the classroom.
Critical Theory was a philosophy that was incompatible with the foundational cultural beliefs of Western society’s liberalism which was founded on equal opportunity and meritocracy. Liberalism was a counter-philosophy to hereditary nobility where a person’s born identity is what determined their success in life. Liberals wanted competency (merit) to determine outcome in life but recognized a person’s origin had significant influence on their capabilities (merit) because competency wasn’t just purely genetic (as a hereditary aristocracy might have you believe) but also based upon one’s nurture (of which, many nobles would have had the wealth and privilege to acquire at a better capability than the average peasantry). This is where liberals devised “equality of opportunity” as a goal (a goal which cannot exist outside of idealism) in order to achieve a pure meritocracy in which everyone’s outcome was decided by their own personal merit (individualism was prized by liberals also) instead of one’s identity. Liberals more-or-less achieved their goals and society entered into what is referred to as the enlightenment.
The industrial revolution had upended society as it once was in the earlier years of the enlightenment. The printing press especially and the prominence of schools gave people outside the upper-classes a more direct interest in society as a whole. Many peasants began to question the tenants of liberalism. They were just as a capable and just as smart as the people above them in society, or so they believed, so if their resources didn’t equal that of those above them in society, there must be a fetal flaw in which these resources were allocated. Thus began the prominent of movements such as feminism, Marxism, anarchism, and all the isms that began gaining prominence. While many of the White Western Peasants just wanted a better life, another demographic living in White Western Societies was playing a devious long-game; these were the Jewish Merchants. Jews had no country of their own and all their wealth and influence were directly tied to Western societies. Nobles were easy to buy-off for a rich Merchant class but as the peasant-class wanted more prominence and democracies were beginning to gain momentum, the Jewish Capitalists feared their power and influence could be at an end so they had two goals in-mind: create their own country and ensure that no movement in Western societies was racially motivated. If the peasants banded together through a White Identity, the Jews would lose all their power and influence. A Jewish country of their own would be needed to secure their future.
We then got WWI and WWII as Western societies tried to sort out how the direction of their country would begin to look. The rich and powerful Jewish people though, helped to shape how these societies would look which is why they were so prominent in trying to lead the charge on many of the prominent theories of the time. Most leaders in any of the ism of the time had a significant over representation of Jewish people who attributed their success in steering these groups toward their interests as a necessity for their own survival. Hitler’s Nazis proved the greatest fear of Jewish groups come to life. Fortunately, through significant Jewish influence in both Britain and the USA, Jewish groups were both able to prevent a German National Country from gaining any prominence and create a Jewish state called Israel. Unbeknownst to the millions of White people who died in these wars, their futures were decided not by White men for the interests of White men but by rich Jewish Merchants in cahoots with White men whose interests were heavily influenced by the money and power of these Jewish groups. It was decided behind closed doors that White people were never allowed to have a nation purely to themselves because of what happened in Germany. What happened in Germany was irrelevant though, the Jews always wanted to ensure White people never gained a Nation of their own because doing so would exclude the Jews and Jews required White people to exploit for profit. Every single previously White dominant country reformed their immigration laws almost simultaneously post WWII to bring in more non-Whites to the country. The official narrative was to repopulate after WWII (if any narrative was given) but the real reason was to cause racial division and ensure these countries would in-time be unable to stand as a White Nation any longer, especially with a democracy since Whites would eventually lose the majority of votes and be dominated by non-Whites (which is why dictatorships were feared so heavily because it can counter a democracy when demographics no longer benefit the previously dominant class as was the case in Rome when the republic fell to the empire. The original Romans were no longer a majority in the republic). Jewish interest groups began created a society that guarantee their success to the detriment of White people and this is where Critical Theory was so valued.
In order to gain prominence in White democratic societies where Jews were only a minority, Jews would need to create a culture in which the lesser gained prominence over the greater. Critical Theory was a perfect tool for precisely this. A theory which said if someone’s merit was such that their outcome was better than yours it’s because they are actually an oppressor and you are a victim of their oppression so you deserve more instead of them until equality between you and them is gained. Of course, the idea of equality was not what the rich and powerful Jews wanted. They wanted an excuse for being on-top of everywhere else and this is where the narrative of the holocaust was born and promoted in Western societies as if Jews were Jesus on a Cross, killed by the Romans (Germans). Jews had created the perfect victim-complex which they used to propel themselves up throughout society to the top of every institution and stay on-top for decades. Anyone who dared to question the disproportional representation of Jews in any aspect of Western society was immediately declared an anti-Semite and the holocaust was immediately invoked as justification. Through classical conditioning regarding Hitler, Jews and the holocaust that the peasant class was put through in academia (K-12 curriculum) and Hollywood (Movies, TV Shows) along with printed media (books, newspapers and magazines), the Jews succeeded at being made a privilege class justified through the belief that they were forever victims and none should dare question it.
Now, understand that throughout most of the late 20th century, it was only the elite who even knew of Critical Theory because it started being fed to people at the Ivy League schools in the USA in the 1970s. We also, did not have the internet so information moved slower than it does now. Most people raised in the late 20th century still believed in liberalism not in Critical Theory but Critical Theory was beginning to gain prominence, especially among women and non-Whites near the end of the 20th century because as non-Whites and women began gaining prominence in society thanks in-part to changes in technology (allowing women to do more work that wasn’t labor intensive) and structural policies (Civil Rights and Immigration Acts forcing White people to include non-Whites), a problem began developing which was that the tenants of liberalism did not appear to be holding up. Despite being given equal opportunity to White men, both women and non-Whites were still falling behind White men in outcome. For a liberal, this shouldn’t be happening because if all men and women were equal (no longer equal under God as religion was now dropped by most in society), then with equal opportunity, equal outcome should follow. By this point in time, the ideas of Critical Theory began to shape organically but they were ushered along because the foundation among the elite had already been established in the 1970s. If non-Whites and women were not equal in outcome to White men, it must be because they were oppressed by White men. All these cultural thoughts were transpiring in the classrooms, on internet discussions and thanksgiving dinners by the 2000s though they were overshadowed in the beginning-mid 2000s by “Rape Culture”: much more women were entering university and the rules of engagement for sex as determined by the old world didn’t work for these women so we had a decade of fixes, many of which men saw as being oppressive to them but they ignored because being able to sleep with sluts without going to prison wasn’t a major concern.
The elite though and especially the Jewish elite almost got undone in the late 2000s from the Financial Crisis. The Financial Crisis put the crosshairs right onto the banking sector in Western society which has been the historical primary dominance of Jewish Merchants in Western society. The young were furious that their entire future might have been undone because of a bunch of Jews speculating with financial transactions and engagement in risky financial practices that evidently crashed the whole economy. The movement called Occupy Wall Street (OWS) was born out of the Financial Crisis and if I were a Jew, I might have been worried another Nazi German was brewing. As OWS gained prominence and didn’t seem to be going away, identity politics soared. Many prominent OWS leaders said anything their groups would organize around a single point of unity, a bunch of Non-Whites, gays and women would begin tearing the unity apart by demanding the group focus on their specific identity issues. Prior to OWS, hardly anyone searched the term Critical Race Theory or Identity Politics or anything like that but as soon as OWS started, the google search statistics soared and banks started doing pride parades, they started internal feminist groups and they started hiring a bunch of non-Whites at every opportunity. Whether this was specifically engineered by the Jewish elite to avoid another Nazi Germany from the fallout of the Financial Crisis or it was just impeccable timing with thanks to the foundational Critical Theory culture being pushed in academia for the last 40 years, in any case, the era of Identity Politics and the Woke 2010s had begun.
The 2010s is where the large political disconnect between people of different identities began. Most people actually had no idea the identity wars had even begun. Many different pressures were at play in the 2010s. The 2010s is when the internet truly became used by nearly everyone instead of just nerdy high IQ White men. Mainstream media began to lose its prominence. Journalism became a professional anyone with a phone and an internet connection could engage in. The government was busy engaging in DEI mandates behind the scenes through changes to labor laws no one even knew had happened. The justice system became dominated by the same elite Critical Theory indoctrinated academic students who grew up during this era. Other issues were at play as well. The Greek debt crisis which also began around the same time which was fueled by demographic changes and high social service costs were a big wake up call to many average Westerners that all their social programs were essentially designed like a Ponzi Scheme which needed an ever increasing group of young people to fund. With more women in education, birth rates were plummeting in Western societies. Many people who had no care whatsoever for Jewish interests began seeing immigration as the only path forward to sustain the finances of their nations. For Jewish groups who had interests in immigration other than financial ones, it was easy to nudge people in the direction of immigrants since the idea of social services reform was too politically difficult to stomach for most politicians. Immigrants seemed like an easy way out.
The problem was that as immigration increased in Western societies and a switch to Critical Theory began to become the prominent belief in society (no longer liberalism), it meant that White men were continuously oppressed harder than they ever were before. A lot of White men who did everything their society asked of them began falling behind everyone else and it became obvious that a lack of competence or merit was not the reason. By the time politics in Western societies between dominated by Liberals clinging to the old ways (often branded as right-wing, Republican, Conservative or Classical Liberals) vs. Critical Theorists (often branded as left-wing, Liberals, Democrats, or Leftists).
Where does Donald Trump come into play in all of this? Well, White men tried to discuss the problems they were facing as a group but they were immediately attacked by women and non-Whites the second they said there was anything wrong. Older White men hadn’t a clue what the younger White men were facing so these older White men also scolded the White men for complaining about their privilege. The 2010s were a period of intense humiliation, alienation, oppression and hatred for White men. Even to this day, many non-Whites and women still do not acknowledge the harm White men faced in the 2010s era. Since White men’s voice was nearly completely silenced in the 2010s when Donald Trump rose to power and simply said the things on White men’s minds and could get away with it, he was hailed as a hero. The problem was that he was not a hero, he was a politician. That didn’t matter though because no other candidate represented the interests of White men so White men had no choice and the fact the people who spent over a decade oppressing White men hated Trump just made Trump all the more likable to White men. Still, Trump gained the support of the “alt-right” who were people that realized both Liberalism and Critical Theorists were wrong.
Many of these alt-right people realized Trump was not who he said he was after his first term and gave up on politics. These people instead spent all their time studying how society ended up the way it was and that’s how anyone would have been able to write the preamble I just did. There’s no right-wing propaganda needed to be read in some radicalization groups online to have a man write the same preamble as myself, like some mainstream news source might tell you is going on. Instead, the wider net and more vigorous of one’s studies a White man casts in an attempt to explain what is going on in his society, the more likely he’ll end up writing something like what I just wrote. One only needs propaganda and radicalism to believe in either liberalism or critical theory because both when taken to an extreme are wrong and this is now obvious in the reality of many people living (the ideals of both have now been tested and young people are living through the results). No man is equal to another man nor are women equal to men. Given our differences, if we are given equal opportunity, the outcome will never be equal. Since the outcome will never be equal between all people because of all of our real differences, that means despite no oppression by those with a superior outcome toward those with an interior outcome, an inferior will always exist thus to maintain equality one must constantly oppress the superior in order to unjustly elevate the inferior. This is the truth many on the alt-right eventually came to and it is this they’ve been trying to push in politics. Politics must be racial and sexual as the era of Identity Politics suggested but not for the reasons the non-Whites and women think. It must be racial and sexual so that we can understand and study the real differences between the different races and genders in order to understand what differences in outcome are normal, given these differences and not a reflection of either oppression or a lack of equal opportunity. Despite no oppression and equal opportunity we must accept that there will be differences in outcome among different people rather than correct for it because any correction is a detriment to one group for the benefit of another which is in itself oppression and exploitation. This is real harm which must be eliminated. Both liberalism and critical theory causes real harm to people and especially White men in previously White dominant societies.
The movement surrounding Trump was a movement among people who have not necessarily realized the truth of the deficiencies of both Liberalism and Critical Theory but who have felt its impacts and understand at least at some level the need to do something different other than to double-down on either the traditional liberal or current critical theory ideologies. Trump himself was always a politician and a bad one at that who was celebrated not because he was an idol who was worshiped like many on the left (Critical Theory group) would have you believe. The loss of the midterms represents both a loss and a new opportunity. Trump used the alt-right to gain power then he tossed them aside and aligned himself with mainly Liberals in his first term and then specifically Jewish Interests (who overlap with both Liberals and Critical Theory as Jewish interests are a third group outside the normal left-right dynamic). Neither group is one that the alt-right cares about however between liberalism and critical theory; liberalism is superior for White men so that’s why there was still an allegiance and why Trump felt he didn’t need to cater toward the alt-right at all because he thought they’d be stuck voting for him no matter what. In Trump’s second term not only did he nearly completely abandon all his promises but he made it clear his only concern was Jewish foreign policy which to the alt-right is a desecration to the alt-right because the alt-right tends to be educated enough on the subject of Jews to hate them for what Jews have done to their own country, unlike the left who only hates Jews because of what Jews have done to Palestinians. Since Trump’s second term nearly 100% (yes, nearly 100%) of net jobs have gone to women, which means if a breakdown for White men exists, I suspect White men have LOST jobs since Trump’s second term. Trump completely abandoned his voting-base and so the midterms show that. The democrats will not help White men either but the idea that one should vote for the right guy to oppress you over the left guy is outright humiliating. Better to not vote at all then to vote for any guy who doesn’t represent your interests. A vote was never going to change the culture of a society. To change the culture of Western society from liberalism to critical theory, it required 60+ years of systemic pressure through the control of nearly every institution. A single vote was never going to fix any alt-right man’s problem. Now that Trump, a man who did nothing for the alt-right, is out, the opportunity is that the alt-right might be able to rebrand under someone else; though, that is also an unlikely scenario but at least perhaps the discussion can be about what it ought to be; about liberalism vs. critical theory and the third position. We’ve got 2 years to figure it out.
I believe the next decade is going to bring about what I will call the information dark age. We’ve nearly hit the end of the Wild Wild West of information. Data used to be fairly free. AI is causing a lot of companies to close-off access to their data. These AI companies are not giving us access to any information either because they’re hoarding it all for themselves. AI safeguards are ramping up such that modern AI is becoming more stupid than what a google search used to be. All the potential gain we thought AI was going to bring is evidently not going to bring us this because AI companies have realized if they buy up all the data, then keep it to themselves, they can have their AI models go through the data and come up with profitable idea themselves. If they give the public access to their information then they are losing a potential profitable idea to themselves. This is why AI companies want to kill open-source models so bad and with the democrats in power in the USA, I believe the democrats will move toward doing what the Judeo-AI Gods want them to do. I believe digital IDs are coming and soon you won’t be able to do anything on the internet without the central authorities (government and big corps) knowing who you are. It won’t be forced but with access to information being completely closed off as every company now wants to sell their data, they simply won’t let you access the internet anywhere you’d want to use the internet until you prove your identity (which they’ll say is needed to prove it’s not an AI bot scanning for data because if you scan for data under your account, you’ll get charged for it. See how France is trying to tax the internet now based on data your accumulate). The problem is that people will NEED to subscribe to expensive cloud AI models to gain access to what a google search could have done 20 years ago because you’ll have no other way to gain access to all the information that will get locked-up in the Information Dark Age. The AI will be programmed by our new Judeo-AI Overlords who will tell you what they want you to think rather than what the actual reality is. This is no different than the actual Dark Ages where people couldn’t speak Latin except the priests who had the bible written in Latin so only they could tell you what it said rather than you read what the reality of what it actually said was. We’re now moving to this sort of gatekeeping for all information that was once free. When this Information Dark Age begins, the battle between liberalism and critical theory won’t even matter to the alt-right anymore. It’ll be the battle between freedom and enslavement.
Upvote
4