I Will Teach You A Lesson in Winning: UCP proposes banning public sector DEI hiring programs and mandatory training

[CaptainTrouble]

This sounds like a win, right? It's not. Why isn't it a win? Because we're not actually solving the underlying problems. I will teach you a lesson in winning.

UCP proposes banning public sector DEI hiring programs and mandatory training

The UCP government tabled a bill on Tuesday that would prohibit mandatory diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) training and DEI-based hiring programs across much of Alberta’s public sector, while expanding legal protections against the non-consensual distribution of intimate content.

www.westernstandard.news

Canada's section 15 of the Charter which is an extension of the Human Rights Act operates on something called SUBSTANTIVE EQUITY. This is basically a fancy way of saying anti-White. This is why victim complexes are so important in Canada because if you're a victim, you're entitled to substantive equity but if you're not a victim, you aren't. That's me putting it in layman terms. The equity or fairness all of us understand is called formal equity aka true equity. Canada does not operate on true equity. That's why conservatives argue time and time again about what is fair but Canada's laws are literally designed to not be fair. It's not about fairness, it's about anti-White "equity". When HR says this is the most "diverse" group of hires ever and it's 9 black people, 1 asian and a White girl; they're basically saying that this is the most substantively equitable group of hiring candidates ever, and they would be right under Canadian law.

How do you win? Smith's idea sounds like winning but it's not. Winning is replacing substantive equity with formal equity. A provincial government can't do this but what a provincial government can do is the following:

• Put a new law through to make illegal to hire based on substantive equity and make formal equity the law of the land (this will apply to all non-federally controlled companies not just Alberta's public sector).
• Use the notwithstanding clause to ensure the above law holds up if challenged through the Charter.
• Smith can then make it illegal for the entire Alberta government (including municipalities) to do business with any entity that follows substantive equity unless it can be justified that no alternative exists. This is important because many businesses like airports, banks, telecommunications, etc... are federally controlled and Alberta cannot ban substantive equity hiring practice but Alberta can ban municipalities from having a bank account with TD because ATB exists which isn't controlled by federal legalization so ATB doesn't have to follow substantive equity. This can go a step further and basically mandate that all public companies use starlink for internet instead of Telus/Rogers etc...

This would be winning. it would be a giant fuck you to Ottawa that would hurt the anti-White oligopolies that run Canada and their Laurentian faggots right in their bank accounts, literally.

But what Smith is doing instead is meh, weak sauce, pathetic. Like a limp noodle. The leftists destroyed this country by slashing Canadians with knives 1000 different ways and she's basically putting a bandaid on one of the cuts. We need to HURT THE LEFTISTS. And she has the power to do the above which would be a huge blow to leftists. She's not doing it, which means we aren't winning.

 

[DistrictPlant]

Don’t get me wrong, I like your idea, but what Smith is doing is more pragmatic.

Targeting public sector is less likely to stir up enough outrage. Lefties will cry about it, but then they’ll move on the the next current thing.

In a year or two, once everybody moves on, she could expand it quietly. This is how commies took over: bit by bit, just big enough to not cause enough outrage.

 

[CaptainTrouble]

Yes, but commies also were working on well over 100 year timelines and had some of the most powerful people on their side. We're trying to undo 100 years worth of subversion. We go too slow and we'll all be dead, including our descendants, by the time we save anything. They've already won the demographic war. Now's the time to strike.

Also, axing substantive equity is actually part of the communist plan. This will be done eventually because the last thing commies want is for Whites to ever be able to use substantive equity to their advantage. If we wait 20 years before switching (which is what's going to happen), you'll have a society where Whites are the oppressed minority that becomes undeniable so courts will start ruling in White people's favor and that's when we'll switch to true equity from substantive because the communist plan was always to introduce Human Rights under the guise of substantive equity in order to oppress White people and as soon as White people become the oppressed minority group, they'll pull Human Rights from under White people's legs so White people can never use the same defense Nons could to help Whites.

We either push formal equity now now or by the time it's on the table, it no longer benefits us.

You're going to literally wait to "go slow" until the very plan you want was actually the same plan the communists want so they won't even oppose it by the time you want it.

EVERY SINGLE ACTION YOU TAKE TO IMPROVE SOCIETY WILL BE OPPOSED BY THE COMMUNISTS. You will never have a time where they aren't opposing you. There's never going to be a sweeping awakening. You fight now or die. Waiting, is stupid. FIGHT THEM NOW WHILE YOU HAVE THE STRENGTH. The longer you wait to fight because fighting is hard, the easier it will be for them to finish you off for good.

 

[DistrictPlant]

Yes, but commies also… had some of the most powerful people on their side

Yeah, but we don’t. What do you think would realistically happen if Smith actually did do all that in one go?

Politicians are followers, where there’s crowd, there’s a politician to preach to it.

So, I think what we can realistically do, is spread a “yes, and” attitude.

Yes, we like Smith’s proposal, and we want more!

 

[CaptainTrouble]

@DistrictPlant The reaction would be a lot of reeeeee'ing but she has the power to do it all. No one can stop her until the next election. We should be making the leftists work so they're the ones scrambling to end laws instead of us. Leftists should be considering it a win if they end the right-wing stuff we enact rather than us being on the defensive and just trying to undo the damage the left is causing us. We need to start causing damage to the left and force them on their heels.