@LordGud
So, I did pay for max cause what I'm working on is fairly important but man, I didn't realize how difficult Claude is to work with. It's so leftist, the bias is insane. Even when I feed it multiple peer reviewed studies from academic journals, it just discounts them for no good reason and keeps to the leftist view of the economic changes. I've been fighting with it since noon yesterday and slowly making incremental gains as I'm able to prove it wrong to the point it has no choice to accept my conclusions but then instead of accepting the average conclusion from the studies it just adjusts the central case closer leftist philosophy without solid rationale, forcing me to continue challenging it.
Then on the other hand, Germini just tells me whatever I want to hear and doesn't challenge the data enough. It'll tell me everyone will shit gold bars if it thought that's what I wanted.
I've just been getting Gemini and Claude to fight with one another. Claude is typically wrong on its takes. It's wayyyyyy too liberal (leftist). It probably has judeo-protections baked in that say if the government isn't taxing people 50% of their earnings, society will crumble.
I like Claude's heavy leftist bias though because if I can get Claude to agree with the numbers, then it's leftist proof.
It's a good thing I have essentially a masters in stats and econ because otherwise I wouldn't be able to challenge these models. Claude literally kept technology as it pertains to the GDP growth as static despite significant changes to Canada's system to improve productivity (it also kept labor productivity the same). I've been fighting with it all day so I probably won't have a finished product for a few days still.
I went ahead and bought more AI power and I'm actually looking at adding several highly reputable economics journals to my respository to get a more accurate analysis on many of the assumptions to better improve the accuracy of my budget given these studies.
Essentially, all I'm doing is removing all taxes in Canada and all social programs (including equalization, healthcare and education), reforming the justice system, rolling up policing, intelligence and xentral banking (which will no longer control interest rates to fix inflation but will be mandated with combating foreign economic wars) into the military, eliminating the CPP and EI then consolidating all the taxes into a "harmonized" consumption tax (that includes rent and interest rate profit on loans based on the differential between cost of debt and price of debt), tariff and foreign capital outlay. So if you buy a product or service in Canada you pay the consumption tax, if you import a product or service to Canada you pay the consumption tax and if you take your profits from Canada and send them overseas you pay the consumption tax (the same percentage for all 3 activities).
The end result is essentially a 6% consumption tax shared between all levels of government (as described above for the 3 metrics) and no other taxes for all levels of government (that means no property taxes as well; literally no other taxes). Instead of resource royalties, the government either sells the land in full at market value or leases it at market value (with resources included in the lease price).
It also includes a free trade agreement with the USA (ending Canada's protectionist supports on lumber and dairy) and the elimination of the need to consult with the Native Indians.
Debt will eventually be eliminated and then it will be illegal for any branch of government to take on public debt.
The controversy of the plan is how to ensure the bottom 40% of Canadians aren't significantly worse off during the transition phases. I'm still working through these kinks. It's possible and can be done but it's tricky. Unwinding Canada's social programs is not a 5 year plan, it's more like a 30+ year plan.
There's also tons of ideology I have to fight through in studies done to ensure the budget is academia approved.
On the birth rate angle, fortunately, there's a lot of studies already on birth rates. One of the most correlative factors reducing birth rates is the time women have to reproduce and post-secondary absolutely destroys this time. Ending all government subsidies to education will lead to higher birth rates. Other strong evidence correlates men's income relative to women (the higher men's income is compared to women's the higher birth rates). My plan would lead to significant higher male incomes and male labor participation which would lead to higher birth rates.
In the end, no segment of the population when looking at averages will be worse off but yes, some people on an individual level will be.
I'm still working out all the kinks and then I'll show you.
I find it interesting that when modeling everything through all available evidence, in the end the tax rate becomes a 6% tax. I actually set 5% as the number to attempt to reach because it's a rounded/"even"/half our base number everyone is familiar with but it just didn't work given the evidence. 6% is what it needed to be. This is interesting to me because I've heard from many sources that in ideal Christendom Kingdoms of old, the overall tax rate was 6%. This can't be a coincidence. Make whatever you will with this info but the whole little season, Jesus 1000 years and Great Reset stuff almost seems on point given this conclusion. 6% appears to be the absolute ideal interest rate for humanity.
Here's what my AI said: "While historic European monarchies collected an average of roughly 6% of GDP in tax revenues, modern first-world nations collect an average of 34% of GDP." My tax would tax roughly 6% of GDP and this was by accident. I didn't think anything of it until I remembered that 6% and monarchy number from other online memes. Wild.
