The Great Awakening Thanksgiving and Politics

Sgt. Goosenip

Active Member
I just had Thanksgiving dinner with extended family and got into some mild political discussion. Here are some noteworthy observations from the normie boomers I interacted with:

There was some mild ‘noticing’ of things, which were brought up unprovoked. For example, one person lamented about how ‘racist’ the new Indian immigrants were. Also, how bad it is that new Indian neighbours think nothing of housing dozens of people, which ‘isn’t fair’ for a bunch of reasons. It was low-level stuff, but it’s something.

I got into some in-depth discussion with one of them, who seemed open-minded, and I thought I’d try out some different approaches. One of them seemed to be supporting the idea that Canada is and has always been a multicultural country, which is a great thing. I reminded him that when he grew up, Canada was 90% European, which affords the luxury of having little enclaves (Chinatowns, etc) without it being much of a problem. I cited stats about diversity and lower social trust, which he seemed acknowledge (e.g., immigrants give preferential treatment to their own, as do corporations that are incentivized to hire them).

When I brought up the need for some overarching ideology or religion to bind us all together, beyond our being a mere ‘economic zone’ of disparate people, he noted how all the world’s great religions have the same underlying themes of being kind, caring for your neighbours and so on. I noted that while that may be true for Christianity, Islam does not seem to work like that. He seemed mildly open to what I was saying about muslims treating their own and non-muslims in very different ways.

I thought it was interesting for him to suggest that ‘just like how we came together during WWII against a common enemy, Trump is allowing us to come together in opposition to him.’ He thought Carney was doing a great job, noting how Canada needs to be more independent from the US. I agreed, referencing the loss of the Avro and space programs, the selling of our gold reserves, etc., though I pointed out how Carney is simply steering us into the arms of UK globalism, which involves us losing our independence.

Anyway, nothing shocking, but I thought this was interesting. Anyone else have political discussions at Thanksgiving?
 
Upvote 6
I'd have said that it's worth noting that when most religions were invented, traveling was difficult so if a foreigner made the long journey, showing compassion to him was fine and your nation would never shrink passed 90% of your own people in 50 years time like what happened in modernity due to the technology we have for traveling today. In short, religious values are obsolete for modernity and we need to adapt.

I had a discussion about how AI companies want government control of the industry in hopes of getting a a bailout from taxpayers but Trump so far seems to be playing it right by not allowing it. My worry is that the democrats will fall for the AI control and bailout scheme so I hope the AI bubble crashed before Trump leaves office and after the midterms. The leftist I was discussing with seemed to accept this but I don't think they were convinced that a bailout would be a bad thing so if the Democrats bailed out the industry, they'd probably be fine with it.

I also brought up how Carney "diversifying" to the EU is pointless because Europe is too far away that the cost of shipping compared to trading with the USA nullified any potential gains. I said so long as Native Indians keep holding the country hostage by requiring bribes to get any industrial capabilities built then that's it for Canada. They agreed but they're also convinced Carney will be tough on Natives and get stuff done.

My overall takeaway is that Carney has years (like how Trudeau got a decade) because Canadians truly start to question if he's actually helping or not. Leftists trust Carney and believe he'll fix their problems. Only after many years of their problems not being fixed would they consider that maybe he's ineffective. The problem of course being that if they couldn't figure out we needed someone better than Carney to fix Trudeau's problems we'll just end up with Trudeau 3.0 after Carney.

Someone I was talking to said that Canada was a rich country because of all of our resources. I had to explain to them that we might have been rich 10 years ago but Trudeau fucked it all up and now we don't produce anything with our resources or even access the raw resources anymore such that we aren't rich. I realized in the discussion that they don't understand how to measure rich and they're convinced Canada is actually wealthier than the USA. They're convinced because they saw some poor black welfare queens on the news that the USA is dirt poor and that because Canada has free everything that makes us rich.
 
In short, religious values are obsolete for modernity and we need to adapt.


I would disagree. Over here we don't take our faith seriously because we are domesticated fat and lazy consumers. However that's not true among many of the people that are here to replace us. Many of them take it VERY seriously and we will find out more about that in the coming decades.

If anything, we have lost because we have allowed the socialists in to secularize our way of life and convince people that worship is 'outdated'. What is the result? An entire generation of emotionally immature man-children that will be bred out of existence because they would rather pretend to be two spirited and take a shit in a litterbox made for cats.

You may not agree, but I am convinced that every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that Christ is Lord at the end. You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.
 
↑View previous replies…
Christianity may be "reality" for you, but it isn't for most people in our society and as such can never be a unifying force in the future
 
@ChevChelios

Christianity may be "reality" for you

I didn't mean to mince words, it's not just 'for me', it's reality, period. You are free to disagree of course, but this world is temporary and the truth will be made clear to all of us at the end.


Don't misunderstand me, when I say every knee will bow, that is after they die. Christ Himself said that the path to Him is narrow and few will make it. It is also made clear that the world will fall into evil and chaos.
 
@brutana_dilewski: I respect your faith, I really do, but even you can't imagine that most people in society are going to magically re-embrace Christianity at some point in the future; even the Bible itself doesn't make that claim, but only predicts the global triumph of your faith once the entire Earth has been destroyed
 
@brutana_dilewski: OK, so what happens after they are dead? It's claimed that "every knee shall bow" to Jesus, meaning 100% of humanity, but how do you square this with the Gospel claim (Matt. 7:13-14) that the vast majority of human beings are destined for "destruction", i.e. eternal torture in Hell?
 
Religion isn't the solution. The problem with modernity isn't a lack of religion, it's too much government control. Nearly every problem in society isn't caused by a lack of faith, it's caused by government regulations. Lowering taxes, cutting social programs and reducing regulations would do far more to solve the problems of modernity than religion ever could.
 
@ChevChelios

'Even knee will bow to Jesus' simply means that every individual will be judged by Him. They may or may not have chosen to worship Him during their lifetime, but they will be judged nonetheless.

Those who have put their faith in Christ and served Him shall be given eternal life with Him. Those who rejected Him will have their wishes respected and they will live apart from Him eternally.

'Every knee will bow' does NOT mean that everyone will become a Christian in this lifetime.
 
@CaptainTrouble

Atheistic governments always lead to extreme authoritarianism. Robespierre, Stalin, Kim Il-sung, Mao Zedong, they all had a problem with that.

Everybody worships something - the question is who or what is truly worthy of worship?

I used to be an atheist, I read Dawkins and Hitchens and Harris. I used to find their arguments compelling. That is until I realized that in order for them to explain good and evil, they had to borrow terminology from the theists. They had no answer for "how to get an ought from an is". The only logical conclusion to atheism is "It just is"

I will be the first to admit that I am far from a perfect person. I wouldn't even call myself a good person. However, I do think that I have come to grips with the reality of this existence.
 
@brutana_dilewski Governments run by anyone except morally good White men turns authoritarian. Atheism isn't the problem. We've had many tyrants in history that were religious.

Also, as Benjamin Franklin said, the following is true: "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom.
As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.”

The point being that since we have significant amounts of non-Whites in society and jews with power and influence, even if a morally righteous man like myself gained power, I would be forced to go hard authoritarian to get the society back on track because our enemies fucked things up long enough such that we need authoritarian leaders to solve the problem. Hitler is a fine example of this.

The problem with modernity is that jews run our societies and we have tons of brainwashed Whites mixed with lesser races.

The issue with religion is that religion doesn't force anyone to do anything. You want everyone to become some ideal "choose to follow" X religious values but no one will unless they're forced to, at least initially, until society heals from the damage already done to it. But direct force by holding a gun to someone's head and forcing them to do that ngs causes immense pain and suffering. We don't need to do that. Simply reducing taxes, government spending and government regulations will force people to change. The reason we've become an atheistic society is because the government created laws that harm religious values. Taxes, government spending and regulations all force people to become atheistic. Get rid of this and people will naturally gravitate toward good moral values with or without religion.
 
Thanksgiving this year didn't get too political, thankfully. It was me, mom and dad, and several family friends, and the food was to die for.

Although, mom said "if the referendum vote goes that way enough, the [UCP] might just proceed with independence anyway." While that would be the greatest thing to happen, I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way.
 
Back
Top