New Team Canada approach: Steal elections by claiming someone else is interfering in them

Koba

Well-Known Member

Allegations of possible U.S. interference dominated the Quebec election campaign Friday. This prompted Coalition Avenir Québec Leader Christine Fréchette to seek a meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney and contact the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) as the province heads into the final 10 days before the Oct. 5 vote. The controversy follows reports that an American think tank published proposals to weaken Canadian unity, including supporting and financing the province’s sovereigntist party, the Parti Québécois...

(Source for these claims: a nothingburger essay whose contents won't even publish)

It's not like the Federal government is running the same scare over and over because they know it's the only way to keep their mandate
 
Upvote 8
Only Chinese influence is permissible. And it’s totally fine for Canadians to influence and interfere in US elections like Cottage Cheese was just doing.
 
What's so funny about this is the evidence they are using is not actually evidence. It's the equivalent of taking a twitter post by a no name account, which may have donated to some controversial streamer, being used to accuse that streamer of being a paid up agent.

I would like to see the think tank paper however, that's some good stuff
 
I'm well read and one of the subjects I'm well read on is history. One of the most entertaining things about history is reading about democracy. In every single democracy that's now history, the historians all talk about how rigged the democracy was. You'll read about how the 8 richest families really controlled the whole democracy and it was a sham, etc... yet, every single modern democracy is fair. I find that fascinating. Every democracy in history was rigged but every modern democracy is fair. Come on guys, how retarded is everyone? Don't answer that.

All democracies are rigged. democracy is actually one of the worst forms of government if not the worst. Actually, I'll double down on it: universal suffrage democracy is literally the worst form of government. Restricted suffrage democracy has merit. Monarchy is not good but it's not bad. It's better than universal suffrage democracy. The biggest issue with universal suffrage democracy is that the end result typically ends up being whatever the rich and powerful elite in society want; which is how all governments go BUT with a universal suffrage democracy, the peasants seek to think they have power and they accept the result rather then condemn the corrupt elite. So, here with are with a rigged democracy that only benefits the corrupt elite and I, a peasant, can't even find common ground with other peasants for how atrociously run our society is because my fellow peasant thinks he picked the government so it's actually a good thing. I have to have it to the elite; what a wonderfully diabolical system universal suffrage is but it's honestly, the worst form of government.

I'd say a restricted suffrage consitutional Republic with a mechanism for a dictator to take charge is the best form of government. The Romans really did have the right idea in that regard.
 
Can you provide examples of democracies that failed historically? I'd like to look into this as well.
 
Japan, Italy and Iceland are examples of countries that had democracies that failed after ancient times (Greece/Rome) but before the current modern era. Then of course you've got Greece and Rome (the famous examples).
 
So fundamentally you are trying to say Canada should be allowed to steal elections using spurious allegations, which allow CSUCK to intervene, whenever they want. That's pretty shitty
 
Back
Top