How fascism starts “First they fascinate the fools. Then, they muzzle the intelligent!”

We’ve tried everything else, let’s give fascism a fair shake.
 
We've tried fascism too... remember?
 
↑View previous replies…
No you didn’t but grasp away

Also, and I wasn’t going to mention this but I do appreciate how you subtly give yourself away with your book recommendation. Forgive me if I don’t trust your Jesuit author. I’m Sure it’s nothing but a coincidence that his sons are in media and his daughter is married to one of the biggest cucks in the MSM

“But he’s a conservative now!!”

Please.
 
@Home_4: "If it's not a Hitler fanboy video on Rumble it's not real history"

All slapfighting aside, if you think that fascism is genuinely the best option for Canada you need to explain in detail why that is the case, rather than going on a perpetual nostalgia trip about a form of German collectivism 80 years ago that couldn't function without throwing dissenters into camps
 
@ChevChelios ahh there it is, put me in the box and give me the hoops to jump through
I don’t need to do a damn thing for ya nor am I feeling inclined to at this point
I prefer the slap fight

We’ve tried everything else, let’s give fascism a FAIR shake. I know why that scares you so much now.
 
@Home_4: "I know why that scares you so much now."

Well, don't keep us in suspense: is it because I'm 1) actually Jewish 2) a Christian dissenter (shabbos goy!!) 3) a gimp in a wheelchair who doesn't want to get gassed 4) a white man who foolishly thinks that enslaving other white people isn't actually "pro-white" 5) Polish, Dutch, Greek, Norwegian, Czech or from one of the many other European ethnicities fucked over by the Nazis?
 
@ChevChelios I was thinking because you’re a smug university graduate (probably late 90’s early 00’s) who has centered their entire identity around trying to sound smart, Has no actual insight or conviction and when pressed with a real dissenting opinion resorts to “you need to’s” and “read this book”

Jewish? Maybe. Faggot? Certainly.

Polish , Dutch, Greek, Norwegian. And Czech

You just listed every country that tried to play both sides under the guise of neutrality. Most getting bit early on. Do I agree with everything that happened to them? Not quite, but if the Nazis were so bad you’d think it would be pretty easy to pick a side from the outset. And partisans get what they get. And this is coming from someone who would likely be a partisan.
 
@Home_4: "Jewish? Maybe. Faggot? Certainly."

That'll certainly come as a surprise to my Catholic wife and kids. Maybe your computer isn't actually a crystal ball, you dumbass?

While we're making wild guesses about each other: I get the impression that you're just a marginalized loser type with a grudge against society that you're channelling into impotent revenge fantasies and a tendentious re-interpretation of twentieth-century history -- in other words, you're practically indistinguishable from an online Communist who has the exact same personality type. Yes yes, when you get power it'll be different, you're going to make everybody finally pay for laughing at you, you're going to get that woman at long last, and you're going to be a big fucking man! You poor bastard
 
@ChevChelios points for making me look up tendentious I suppose

But you wouldn’t know if I was reinterpreting history or not seeing as you read a book and parrot it as if it’s your own experience. Probably because that’s all you know how to do. It’s not your fault as much as it is the public school system. Maybe you can read a psychology book one day and fix the world, we’d be so lucky. A real good will hunting over here.

Catholic wife and kids lol “I need some filler words that have nothing to do with my internet argument, what can I add?” Did getting called a faggot online cut that deep?
 
@Home_4: No, you were right all along. I'm actually a Jewish homosexual who was sent to infiltrate this forum and turn it away from fascism. Thank God you used your superior Aryan intellect to find me out. You are FCW's greatest hero
 
@CaptainTrouble: Anyone with half a brain can see that the Nazis were diagnosing a legitimate problem (or in fact, many problems) with German society in the late 20s/early 30s, but as often happens the proposed cure turned out to be worse than the disease
 
@CaptainTrouble: If Britain was really seeking to destroy Germany from the start, why did it try to appease Hitler with the Munich Agreement? And if Hitler was really a good boi who dindu nuffin, why did he quickly break the Agreement -- leading the British to conclude that he was fundamentally untrustworthy, and paving the way for the Second World War?
 
@ChevChelios he basically told Britain in all but words what he was planning and offered Britain many ways out that would have benefited Britain but they made the wrong decision. Why did Britain's Empire completely fall into nothing after Churchill had his way? The British fucked up because they were pushing jewish interests not White people's and we've all suffered because of it. Hitler was doing the right thing. Britain did not do anything right in WWII.
 
@CaptainTrouble: "he basically told Britain in all but words what he was planning"

What do you mean, "in all but words"? You mean he told Britain through means of facial expressions and hand gestures that the British, not being mind readers, failed to interpret? Unless the Munich Agreement specifically said that Hitler could conquer as much of eastern Europe as he liked he was definitely at fault for breaking it

"Why did Britain's Empire completely fall into nothing after Churchill had his way?"

Britain bankrupted itself fighting the Second World War to such an extent that it couldn't afford to maintain its imperial possessions any longer. But this was not something that could have been foreseen by either the British or the Germans in 1938, so it can't be used as an excuse for the outbreak of the War itself

"Hitler was doing the right thing"

Makes you wonder why every European country invaded by the Germans put up such a strong military resistance... but let me guess, it was the Jews who persuaded the French, Norwegians, Dutch, Poles, Greeks and Russians to fight back against foreign invasion? No real white European would ever try to defend his country unless Schlomo was telling him to, right?
 
@ChevChelios Hold on, did you just say the French put up strong military resistance... Lol.

But, this is where we differ. You like modernity and I do not so from my perspective the West made a mistake and from your perspective they did not. We'll never agree on this because we're very different people. That's understandable.
 
@CaptainTrouble: "did you just say the French put up strong military resistance... Lol"

"French deaths during the invasion and occupation of France in WWII included approximately 92,000 dead"

This is why I can't take you seriously: your entire worldview is built upon simplistic and cartoonish stereotypes. "Germans are stronk! French are pussies!" etc. Jesus, go and learn some actual history rather than Wehrmacht fanboy fiction and then report back to us
 
Fascism is what we have today, it's just the rulers of our society are jewish and promote jewish interest. A White fascist society that promotes White people's interests would be superior to what we have today. Universal suffrage democracy where foreign invaders get the same illusion of political input as you do is worse than an authoritarian dictatorship in which the dictator is working for the interests of the people. Democracy in a multicultural society can never work for the people.

For anyone who thinks we don't live in a fascist regime, you should analyze how much influence the government has on commerce. Today, the government has more control on production than fascist Italy or the Nazis did.

"Fascism" is hardly the problem. The problem is people working against our interests and they will do so under any form of government. No form of government can be good so long as your enemies run the government.
 
"White fascist society that promotes White people's interests"

I dunno, did the Nazis promote white people's interests when they sent Christian dissenters to concentration camps, gassed the disabled, enslaved the inhabitants of conquered countries, destroyed half of Poland and conscripted the flower of Germany's youth to die pointlessly on the Eastern Front? There's a reason why people don't want to relive that whole nightmare, and it isn't because of Jewish brainwashing: it was yet another example of the State eating society while pretending to represent its interests, just like Communism. G.K. Chesterton, who was no friend of the Jews, accurately pointed out that National Socialism was extremely "Hebraic" in its manner of thinking: a chosen people, a promised land, the outsiders are scum etc.

We don't need fascism, we need the Canada of 1960 to come back (even though the Left would say that it's the same thing). Fix the demographics and you've solved 90% of the problems facing this country
 
Christian dissenters
Click to expand...
So, you're saying these White people were working against the interests of White people? Even if they were White, if they were working against the interests of White people then they are a problem that must be dealt with. Shabbos Goys are rampant in modern society and these traitors will need to be dealt with regardless of their race.

gassed the disabled
Click to expand...
If the disabled can't care for themselves, then good riddance

enslaved the inhabitants of conquered countries
Click to expand...
As they should. Well done.

destroyed half of Poland
Click to expand...
15% of Poland was jewish with significantly more crypto-jews and a lot of jewish supporters, so it makes sense

conscripted the flower of Germany's youth to die pointlessly on the Eastern Front
Click to expand...
Hindsight is 20/20.


When the situation in Canada is such that there is enough power to fix the demographics of Canada, you'll have a fascist regime in power.
 
enslaved the inhabitants of conquered countries
Click to expand...
As they should. Well done."

"If the disabled can't care for themselves, then good riddance"

Have you ever considered the possibility that you're simply an asshole who is naturally attracted to an ideology developed by other assholes?
 
↑View previous replies…
Have you considered the possibility that you actually like modern society and have very little problems with it aside from some minor thematic issues that at the core, really don't matter?
 
@ChevChelios I would consider your view to be naive. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands died in Ukraine, more dying everyday in Palestine. Our leaders don't share the same values as you but they don't promote our interests. Your values are what hold you back from doing what you ought to do to promote your own interests. Unlike you, I don't believe dying on a cross while getting slapped in the face by my enemies is a virtue. I have a fundamental problem with Western morality because I believe it was taught to us specifically to placate us and turn us into nothing but slaves.

You win by killing your enemies.

Those inferior to you could use a little guidance and the relationship of that may be seen as a master/slave one.

Some issues over resources must be dealt with through warfare.

No repression is necessary if you have the interests of me and my people at heart. Cycle back to point 1. If you don't have the interests of me and my people at heart then it sounds like you're my enemy and we win by killing our enemies.
 
@CaptainTrouble: "Unlike you, I don't believe dying on a cross while getting slapped in the face by my enemies is a virtue"

Thanks for the strawman, but I never said anything of the kind. I have no problem at all with legitimate self-defence, but invading, enslaving and mass-murdering your (white) neighbours isn't it. It's deeply hypocritical to complain about Communist brutality when all you want is the same brutality with the Nazis being in charge of it instead. Why complain about the petty repressions of modern Canada when your ideal government would just be the same thing times ten? It was OK for the Nazis to forcibly round up the disabled and gas them, for example, but not for Canada to offer voluntary euthanasia? It was OK for the Nazis to throw critics of their regime into concentration camps, but not for Canada for freeze the bank accounts of the convoy protesters? It was OK for the Nazis to use slave labour in the countries they occupied, but not OK for the Canadian government to take away 40% of your paycheque in taxes? Fuck off
 
@ChevChelios it's called tribalism. When my people do it, it's right. When others do it to me, it's not.

In any case, I do not agree with everything the Nazis did but the Nazis were reasonable White men, they weren't lunatics. They had disagreements but despite those disagreements they weren't actively working to undermine eachother because they knew they were all working for their benefit even if they disagreed on the methodology at times.

Also, Poles aren't Aryan. Hitler was right about that but in modernity we include them as White because of the necessity to paint a wider brush with what White is out of a need to survive.
 
@CaptainTrouble: "When my people do it, it's right. When others do it to me, it's not."

This is Communist thinking -- as Lenin said, it doesn't matter what crime is being committed, only who is doing what to whom -- and is also the thinking of the Muslims, Jeets, Chinese and other enemies of our society. Now, if you're saying that in an emergency situation we as white men should embrace any ideology, however extreme, that will keep us alive in preference to one that wants us dead, then I can certainly agree with that: but the historical fact remains that National Socialism got tens of millions of white men killed rather than saving their lives
 
@ChevChelios Stop giving everything a label. It's tribal thinking. Here's the thing: when White people enslave blacks, their quality of life improves. When blacks enslaves Whites, this is not true. That's because White people are superior so trying to equalize the rules among all humans is "communist" as you would say since all humans are not equal. Instead, it's not the same thing when White people enslave others compared to when others enslave Whites.
 
Last edited:
@CaptainTrouble: Oh, OK. So whose quality of life improves when a guy in a wheelchair is gassed to death, or a Slav (or Greek or Dutchman etc.) is massacred or enslaved because he tried to defend his homeland from German invasion?
 
@ChevChelios If you cannot survive without government assistance, you do not deserve to live. The life of everyone else improves not having to care for those they did not want to care for by being forced to care for with a gun held to their head and the government forcing them to care for someone they did not want to care for. If you want to care for disabled people then by all means, do so with your own resources. Do not force others to take care of those you want taken care of if you yourself cannot even care for these people.

Don't defend jews? Maybe the Slavs shouldn't have been so aggressive against the Austrians when the foreign occupied government was importing in foreigners (Slavs) as a means to replace, oppress and tyrannize the Austrian people. You know this is why Hitler hated Slavs so much, right? He had personal beef with them in seeing how they treated Austrians when he was growing up.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top