Wonderful news! Quebec court grants “throuples” same legal rights as two-parent families

border_humper

Staff Member
Moderator
Chief Disinfo Officer
Multi-parent families or “throuples,” have been granted the same legal rights as two-parent families regarding custody of children by a Quebec Superior Court judge.

The ruling issued last Friday found that limiting the legal affiliation of multi-parental families to be unconstitutional and that the province must recognize their rights as any other family unit.

The Quebec government now has 12 months to amend the Civil Code to match the ruling, which will only apply to families that were formed before the child is born.

“Throuples” is the term given to a relationship that consists of three people who form a consensual polyamory with one another, meaning they have more than one romantic partner.

“In these times when the right to equality is savagely attacked, it feels good,” wrote lawyer Marc-André Landry after the ruling.

Landry represented the plaintiffs, which consisted of three multi-parent families.

The first is a man and two women who share four children. Another was a lesbian couple and a male sperm donor as well as a couple that involved a husband who had a baby with his wife’s friend due to her infertility issues.

Landry said the ruling does not apply to step-parents or other forms of “modern” families that are formed after a child is born, noting that it’s for those with a planned “parental project.”

“It’s not about step-parents or other potential realities, it’s really about three people sitting together and saying, ‘We should have a child together,’” said Landry. “No one should be treated differently because of their family status.”

Landry told the Daily Mail that “the families are overwhelmed with joy.”

“They are being recognized and treated equally which is important for them but also more important for their children,” he said. “I call it a landmark decision and great progress. I’d compare it to when the law changed around homosexual parenting.”

Multi-parent families already have legal standing in several in Ontario and British Columbia.

“The law has evolved, and homosexual families do exist, are accepted, and it’s not actually an issue anymore in Canada,” he said.

“It’s the same thing here. The law needs to evolve to match the reality of all Canadian citizens, and those babies who have not chosen to be born in multi-parental families. They must have the same protection, same rights as any other babies under the law.”

However, some viewed the decision as a push towards polygamy, which is illegal in Canada and that it may also present an opportunity to exploit social programs such as child benefits.
In case it wasn’t accelerating fast enough for you…
 
Upvote 16
“In these times when the right to equality is savagely attacked, it feels good,” wrote lawyer Marc-André Landry after the ruling

In what way is equality being attacked, let alone savagely attacked?

These morons live in an alternate reality.

Soon enough, Canadian citizens will soon be able to marry more than one person and that will lead to even more jeets coming to Canada.
 

In case it wasn’t accelerating fast enough for you…
border_humperWhat a wild way to make family court even more ridiculous
 

In case it wasn’t accelerating fast enough for you…
border_humper
I'm sure Muslims will be thrilled about this, perfect wedge for polygamy.
 
It's been the case for at least a couple of decades now that polygamous Muslim men in the UK receive extra welfare payments for each of their "wives"
 
Will this be the easiest path to citizenship for those french speaking aprefricans? Just become a bull and subjugate some cuck.
 
Someone I know who is a lawyer and supports strong Christian values believes that a Christian man having two or more wives is allowed, ex see Jacob who had 4 wives, Hannah who was 1 of 2 wives, kings David and Solomon (the wisest man who ever lived) who both had many wives. I don't think he's right but he argues that the New Testament doesn't explicitly disallow it in the original language writings.

And then rulings like this just seem to be opening a can of worms.
 
Next time you see him ask him if people should be allowed to marry their cousins, because that is what Jacob also did.
 
And the less said about Lot and his daughters the better.
 
View previous replies…
Back
Top